Linux Server Uptime Monitoring

Server uptime represents one of the most critical metrics in any IT infrastructure. For businesses relying on Linux servers, maintaining consistent availability directly impacts operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and ultimately, the bottom line. Effective uptime monitoring serves as the foundation of proactive system administration, allowing teams to detect and resolve issues before they cascade into service interruptions.

In the world of enterprise computing, even minutes of downtime can translate to thousands of dollars in lost revenue. According to recent studies, the average cost of IT downtime hovers around $5,600 per minute, with larger organizations potentially facing losses exceeding $300,000 per hour. These sobering statistics highlight why robust monitoring practices aren’t optional—they’re essential.

This comprehensive guide explores the multifaceted approaches to Linux server uptime monitoring, from built-in command-line tools to sophisticated enterprise solutions. Whether you manage a single server or oversee a complex data center, mastering these concepts and implementing appropriate monitoring strategies will significantly enhance your system’s reliability.

Table of Contents

Understanding Server Uptime Fundamentals

Server uptime refers to the continuous operational period of a server without interruption or reboot. In professional environments, uptime is typically expressed as a percentage over a defined timeframe. The gold standard in mission-critical systems is “five nines” availability—99.999% uptime—which translates to just over five minutes of downtime annually.

Uptime targets vary by industry and application criticality:

99.9% (three nines): 8.76 hours downtime per year
99.99% (four nines): 52.56 minutes downtime per year
99.999% (five nines): 5.26 minutes downtime per year
99.9999% (six nines): 31.5 seconds downtime per year

The business impact of downtime extends beyond immediate revenue loss. When servers become unavailable, organizations face diminished productivity, potential data loss, compliance violations, and significant damage to customer trust and brand reputation. For e-commerce platforms, financial services, or healthcare systems, even brief interruptions can have severe consequences.

It’s important to distinguish between availability monitoring and performance monitoring. While related, availability monitoring focuses primarily on whether services are operational, while performance monitoring examines how efficiently they’re running. Comprehensive uptime strategies incorporate both aspects, as performance degradation often precedes complete failure.

Establishing clear uptime goals should form the foundation of your monitoring strategy, balancing business requirements against the reality that achieving higher availability typically requires exponentially greater investment in redundancy, monitoring, and support resources.

Essential Linux Server Metrics to Monitor

Effective uptime monitoring requires vigilance across multiple system components. Understanding which metrics matter most helps administrators focus their attention where it delivers the greatest value.

CPU Metrics

CPU load averages provide critical insight into processing demand over time. Linux presents these values in 1, 5, and 15-minute intervals. A load average exceeding the number of available CPU cores generally indicates processor saturation. For example, on a 4-core system, a load average of 6.5 suggests the CPU is significantly oversubscribed, potentially causing application delays and system instability.

More specific CPU metrics to track include:

User time percentage
System time percentage
I/O wait percentages
Context switches
Run queue length

Memory Utilization

RAM availability directly impacts system performance and stability. Key memory metrics include:

Total available physical memory
Used memory percentage
Free memory
Cached memory
Swap usage and frequency of swap operations (swappiness)
Buffer utilization

Excessive swap activity particularly warrants attention, as frequent swapping (thrashing) severely degrades performance and may indicate insufficient physical memory for workloads.

Disk Performance

Storage systems often represent bottlenecks in server performance. Essential disk metrics include:

Available space per filesystem
Inode utilization
Read/write operations per second (IOPS)
Average queue length
Latency measurements
Transfer rates
SMART statistics for physical drives

Network Connectivity

Network reliability directly impacts service availability. Monitor:

Interface throughput (inbound/outbound)
Packet error rates
Collision statistics
Connection counts
Latency to critical services
DNS resolution times
Routing stability

Process Monitoring

Individual application processes require monitoring:

Resource consumption per process
Zombie process count
Thread counts
File descriptor usage
Port availability
Service response times

Establishing baseline values for these metrics during normal operation provides the context necessary to identify anomalies that warrant investigation. Effective monitoring requires not just collecting this data but understanding the relationships between metrics and their implications for system health.

Native Linux Command-Line Monitoring Tools

Linux distributions include powerful built-in tools for system monitoring that require no additional installation. Mastering these commands provides administrators with immediate insight into system status.

The uptime Command

The simple yet informative uptime command displays how long the system has been running, along with load averages:

$ uptime
 15:42:03 up 37 days, 2:03, 5 users, load average: 0.52, 0.58, 0.59

This output reveals the current time, total uptime, number of logged-in users, and load averages for the last 1, 5, and 15 minutes respectively. Monitoring these values over time helps identify patterns and potential resource constraints.

Process Monitoring with top and htop

The top command provides a dynamic real-time view of system processes, displaying CPU usage, memory utilization, and other vital statistics:

$ top

For enhanced functionality, the htop utility offers a more interactive and colorful interface with additional features like horizontal/vertical scrolling and improved process management capabilities:

$ htop

Key operations within these tools include:

Press k to kill processes
Press r to renice (change priority)
Press F to change sort field
Press h for help with additional commands

Memory Analysis Tools

The free command displays total, used, and available memory:

$ free -h
              total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:           31Gi        15Gi       8.5Gi       259Mi       7.6Gi        15Gi
Swap:          2.0Gi          0B       2.0Gi

The -h flag presents values in human-readable format. For more detailed memory statistics, examine /proc/meminfo:

$ cat /proc/meminfo

Disk Usage Monitoring

Track filesystem usage with the df command:

$ df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1       236G  185G   39G  83% /
/dev/sdb1       932G  805G   80G  92% /data

For directory-specific disk consumption, use du:

$ du -sh /var/log
1.2G    /var/log

I/O Performance Analysis

The iostat command provides insights into disk I/O performance:

$ iostat -xz 5

This displays extended statistics (-x) with suppressed inactive devices (-z) every 5 seconds.

Network Monitoring

Monitor network connections and listening ports with these tools:

$ netstat -tuln  # TCP/UDP listening numeric
$ ss -tuln       # Modern alternative to netstat
$ ip a           # Network interface information
$ iftop          # Network bandwidth usage by interface

System Logs

System logs contain invaluable information about service status and errors:

$ journalctl -u service-name  # For systemd-based systems
$ tail -f /var/log/syslog     # Traditional syslog monitoring

Creating Basic Monitoring Scripts

Combine these tools into simple shell scripts for automated checks:

#!/bin/bash
# Simple uptime monitoring script

LOAD=$(uptime | awk '{print $10}' | tr -d ',')
THRESHOLD=4.0

if (( $(echo "$LOAD > $THRESHOLD" | bc -l) )); then
    echo "High load detected: $LOAD" | mail -s "Server Load Alert" admin@example.com
fi

Scheduled via cron, such scripts provide basic automated monitoring capabilities:

*/5 * * * * /path/to/monitoring-script.sh

These native tools form the foundation of Linux monitoring and provide immediate visibility into system health without requiring additional software installation.

Setting Up Automated Monitoring Systems

While manual checks using built-in tools provide immediate insight, automated monitoring systems ensure continuous vigilance without human intervention. Designing an effective automated monitoring framework requires careful planning across several dimensions.

Determining Monitoring Frequency

Different metrics warrant different monitoring intervals. Consider these guidelines:

Critical services status: 30-60 seconds
System resource usage: 1-5 minutes
Disk space: 15-30 minutes
Log file analysis: 5-15 minutes
Database integrity checks: 1-6 hours

Balance monitoring granularity against system overhead—excessive polling creates additional load that can impact performance.

Configuring Alert Thresholds

Effective alerting depends on meaningful thresholds that minimize false positives while catching genuine issues:

Static thresholds: Fixed values (e.g., 90% disk usage triggers warning)
Dynamic thresholds: Baseline-adjusted values that account for normal variations
Trending thresholds: Alerts based on rate of change rather than absolute values
Compound thresholds: Multiple conditions that must be met simultaneously

Advanced systems implement progressive alerting with multiple severity levels:

Warning: Approaching problematic levels
Critical: Immediate attention required
Emergency: Service impact imminent or occurring

Setting Up Notification Systems

Multi-channel notifications ensure alerts reach appropriate personnel:

Email notifications for non-urgent issues
SMS/text messages for critical alerts
Integration with messaging platforms (Slack, Teams)
Automated phone calls for severe emergencies
Ticket creation in help desk systems

Implement notification routing based on:

Time of day
On-call schedules
Issue severity
System/service affected

Centralized Log Collection

Consolidating logs from multiple servers enhances monitoring effectiveness:

Configure rsyslog or syslog-ng for log forwarding
Implement a central log server with adequate storage
Establish log rotation policies to manage disk usage
Deploy log analysis tools (ELK stack, Graylog, etc.)
Create search patterns for common failure signatures

Remote Monitoring Configurations

For distributed environments, implement redundant monitoring approaches:

Internal monitoring from within the network
External monitoring from different geographic locations
Separate monitoring infrastructure from production systems
Cross-server monitoring where servers check each other

These automated systems transform reactive administration into proactive management, significantly reducing mean time to detection (MTTD) and mean time to resolution (MTTR) for infrastructure issues.

Open-Source Linux Monitoring Solutions

The Linux ecosystem offers numerous open-source monitoring solutions to suit environments of all sizes. These platforms extend monitoring capabilities far beyond what’s possible with basic command-line tools.

Nagios: The Veteran Monitoring Platform

Nagios remains one of the most widely deployed monitoring solutions due to its maturity and extensive plugin ecosystem. Its architecture includes:

Nagios Core: The central monitoring engine
NRPE (Nagios Remote Plugin Executor): For executing checks on remote systems
Plugins: Thousands of community-developed monitoring scripts
Web interface: For visualization and management

Setting up basic Nagios monitoring:

Install the package: apt install nagios4 (Debian/Ubuntu) or yum install nagios (RHEL/CentOS)
Configure hosts in /etc/nagios4/conf.d/hosts.cfg
Define services in /etc/nagios4/conf.d/services.cfg
Restart Nagios: systemctl restart nagios

Nagios excels in environments requiring extensive customization but demands significant configuration effort.

Zabbix: Enterprise-Grade Monitoring

Zabbix offers a more modern approach with simplified configuration and powerful database backend:

Agent-based and agentless monitoring options
Built-in auto-discovery for network resources
Sophisticated templating system
Advanced visualization capabilities
Low-level discovery for dynamic environments

Zabbix particularly suits larger environments needing centralized monitoring with delegated administration capabilities. Its database-driven architecture efficiently handles thousands of nodes with minimal performance impact.

Prometheus and Grafana: The Modern Monitoring Stack

The combination of Prometheus (for metrics collection and alerting) with Grafana (for visualization) represents the current state-of-the-art in open-source monitoring:

Time-series database optimized for performance metrics
Pull-based architecture with service discovery
Powerful query language (PromQL)
Stunning dashboards with extensive customization
Alert manager for notification routing

This stack particularly excels in containerized and microservices environments, offering native integration with Kubernetes and other cloud-native technologies.

Basic Prometheus setup:

# Install Prometheus
wget https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/releases/download/v2.35.0/prometheus-2.35.0.linux-amd64.tar.gz
tar xvfz prometheus-2.35.0.linux-amd64.tar.gz
cd prometheus-2.35.0.linux-amd64/

# Configure prometheus.yml with targets
# Start Prometheus
./prometheus --config.file=prometheus.yml

Monitorix: Lightweight Solution for Smaller Servers

For single servers or small deployments, Monitorix offers simplicity without sacrificing capability:

Minimal resource footprint
Built-in web interface
Comprehensive system metrics collection
Automated graph generation
Simple configuration

Installation on Debian/Ubuntu:

apt install monitorix
systemctl enable --now monitorix

Access the interface at http://your-server:8080/monitorix.

Choosing the Right Monitoring Solution

Selection criteria should include:

Infrastructure scale (number of servers/services)
Monitoring requirements complexity
Available administration resources
Integration needs with existing systems
Scalability requirements for future growth
Reporting and compliance requirements

For most environments, the ideal approach combines lightweight agents running on all systems reporting to a centralized monitoring platform. This architecture balances comprehensive coverage with operational efficiency.

Commercial and Enterprise Monitoring Platforms

While open-source solutions offer excellent capabilities, commercial monitoring platforms provide additional features, support, and integration that benefit enterprise environments. These solutions typically deliver enhanced reliability, scalability, and specialized functionality for mission-critical infrastructure.

SolarWinds Server & Application Monitor

SolarWinds provides comprehensive monitoring with particular strengths in:

Automated application discovery
Deep application-specific monitoring (SQL, Exchange, Active Directory)
Hardware health monitoring
Capacity planning and forecasting
Customizable alerting workflows
Integration with other SolarWinds products

Its agent-based architecture supports Linux, Windows, and virtualized environments with unified management, making it particularly valuable in heterogeneous infrastructures.

ManageEngine OpManager

OpManager offers enterprise-grade monitoring with:

Network device configuration management
Automated network mapping
Comprehensive SNMP support
Virtual machine monitoring
Physical server hardware monitoring
Fault and performance correlation

The platform’s workflow automation capabilities allow administrators to define remediation steps that execute automatically when specific conditions occur, reducing recovery time for common issues.

Cloud-Based Monitoring Solutions

Modern cloud monitoring platforms like Datadog, New Relic, and Dynatrace provide:

SaaS delivery model with minimal on-premises footprint
Automatic scaling to accommodate monitoring growth
API-first architecture for extensive integration
Advanced analytics and anomaly detection
Native support for containerized environments
Global distribution for worldwide monitoring

These solutions particularly excel in dynamic environments leveraging cloud infrastructure, offering flexible deployment and consumption-based pricing models.

Cost-Benefit Analysis Considerations

When evaluating commercial vs. open-source options, consider:

Total cost of ownership (licensing, hardware, personnel)
Internal expertise availability
Time-to-implementation requirements
Vendor support quality and availability
Future-proofing and roadmap alignment
Compliance and reporting requirements

Enterprise organizations typically find the best approach combines:

Commercial solutions for mission-critical applications
Open-source tools for specialized monitoring needs
Custom scripts for environment-specific requirements

The integration capabilities between these components ultimately determines the monitoring ecosystem’s effectiveness. Modern platforms increasingly support open standards like SNMP, IPMI, and RESTful APIs that facilitate interoperability.

Best Practices for Effective Uptime Monitoring

Implementing monitoring tools represents only part of the equation—operational practices significantly impact monitoring effectiveness. These best practices enhance monitoring outcomes across any technological foundation.

Establishing Performance Baselines

Before meaningful monitoring can occur, baseline performance must be documented:

Collect metrics during normal operation across different timeframes
Identify patterns related to business cycles (daily, weekly, monthly)
Document seasonal variations and expected spikes
Calculate standard deviations to identify normal variance ranges
Update baselines regularly as workloads evolve

Without established baselines, distinguishing between normal variation and actual problems becomes nearly impossible.

Preventing Alert Fatigue

Alert fatigue—the desensitization that occurs when personnel receive excessive notifications—represents one of the greatest threats to monitoring effectiveness:

Implement progressive thresholds (warning, critical, emergency)
Consolidate related alerts to reduce notification volume
Utilize time-based suppression for flapping services
Create maintenance windows during planned activities
Implement intelligent alert correlation

Remember that each unnecessary alert diminishes attention for genuine issues.

Implementing Escalation Procedures

Define clear escalation paths for different alert types:

First-level response: Initial assessment and basic remediation
Second-level escalation: Specialized technical expertise
Management notification: For persistent or severe issues
Customer communication: For significant service impacts
Vendor engagement: For hardware/software-specific problems

Document these procedures with specific criteria for each escalation level and ensure all team members understand their roles and responsibilities.

Documentation and Runbooks

Comprehensive documentation accelerates incident response:

Monitoring system architecture and dependencies
Alert explanations and common causes
Troubleshooting procedures for each monitored service
Recovery procedures for different failure scenarios
Contacts for escalation and external support
Post-incident review processes

Regular rehearsals of these procedures ensure teams remain prepared for real incidents.

Regular Review and Refinement

Monitoring strategies must evolve continuously:

Conduct monthly reviews of alert patterns
Adjust thresholds based on false positive/negative rates
Update monitoring for new services and infrastructure
Refine escalation procedures based on incident outcomes
Incorporate lessons learned from major incidents

This continuous improvement process ensures monitoring systems remain aligned with business requirements and technological evolution.

Troubleshooting Common Linux Server Uptime Issues

Even with robust monitoring, server issues inevitably occur. Understanding common failure patterns and systematic troubleshooting approaches accelerates resolution and minimizes downtime.

Diagnosing High CPU Usage

When servers experience high processor utilization:

Identify resource-intensive processes: top -c or ps aux --sort=-%cpu
Examine process details: ps -eo pid,ppid,%cpu,%mem,cmd --sort=-%cpu | head
Check for runaway processes: ps aux | awk '$3 > 50.0'
Review thread counts: ps -eLf | grep process_name | wc -l
Analyze system calls: strace -p PID

Common causes include application memory leaks, inefficient code, misconfigured services, or malware activity.

Addressing Memory Issues

For memory-related problems:

Identify memory consumers: ps aux --sort=-%mem
Check for memory leaks: Monitor process growth over time
Examine swap usage: vmstat 1 (si/so columns indicate swap activity)
Review memory allocation: cat /proc/PID/status
Check for out-of-memory events: dmesg | grep -i "out of memory"

Applications with memory leaks often exhibit steadily increasing utilization without corresponding activity increases.

Resolving Disk Space and I/O Bottlenecks

Storage issues frequently impact uptime:

Identify space consumers: du -h --max-depth=1 /path | sort -hr
Find large files: find /path -type f -size +100M -exec ls -lh {} \;
Check for deleted files still in use: lsof | grep deleted
Analyze I/O wait: iostat -x 1
Identify I/O-intensive processes: iotop

High I/O wait times particularly impact application performance and often precede complete service failure.

Network Connectivity Troubleshooting

For network-related interruptions:

Verify interface status: ip a and ip link
Check routing table: ip route
Test connectivity: ping, traceroute, mtr
Examine socket status: ss -tuln
Review connection tracking: conntrack -L
Check for packet drops: netstat -s | grep -i drop

Network issues often manifest as intermittent connectivity problems rather than complete failures, making them particularly challenging to diagnose.

Service Failure Recovery

When critical services fail:

Check service status: systemctl status service_name
Review recent logs: journalctl -u service_name -n 100
Verify dependencies: systemctl list-dependencies service_name
Test manual startup: systemctl start service_name
Examine resource constraints: Process limits, file descriptors, etc.

Create service-specific recovery runbooks that include verification steps to confirm complete restoration.

Using Historical Data for Pattern Recognition

Historical monitoring data enables pattern identification:

Look for recurring issues at specific times
Correlate failures across multiple systems
Identify cascading failures triggered by specific events
Recognize gradual performance degradation preceding failures
Spot resource utilization trends that predict future issues

This analysis transforms reactive troubleshooting into proactive intervention, preventing many issues before they impact services.

Advanced Monitoring Techniques

Beyond fundamental monitoring, advanced techniques provide deeper insights and proactive capabilities that significantly enhance uptime management.

Predictive Analytics for Preemptive Maintenance

Modern monitoring systems leverage machine learning to predict failures before they occur:

Anomaly detection identifies unusual patterns that may indicate developing problems
Trend analysis projects resource utilization to predict capacity constraints
Pattern recognition correlates seemingly unrelated metrics to identify complex failure signatures
Seasonal forecasting anticipates cyclical demand changes

These capabilities transform monitoring from a reactive to a predictive discipline, enabling intervention before services degrade.

Container and Virtualization Monitoring

Virtualized environments require specialized monitoring approaches:

Host-level metrics capture the underlying infrastructure
Guest-specific monitoring tracks individual VMs
Container metrics monitor ephemeral workloads
Orchestration platform monitoring (Kubernetes, Docker Swarm)
Resource contention analysis between workloads

Tools like cAdvisor, Prometheus, and specialized agents provide visibility into these complex environments.

High-Availability Cluster Monitoring

Clustered environments present unique monitoring challenges:

Service state across multiple nodes
Quorum and split-brain detection
Resource failover verification
Replication status and data synchronization
Cluster interconnect performance
Fencing mechanism verification

Monitoring must distinguish between planned failovers and actual failures to prevent unnecessary alerts.

Application Performance Monitoring Integration

Integrating infrastructure monitoring with application performance monitoring (APM) provides end-to-end visibility:

Code-level performance metrics
Transaction tracing across distributed systems
User experience measurements
Database query performance
API call latency

This integration bridges the gap between infrastructure metrics and actual user experience, helping teams prioritize issues based on business impact rather than technical severity alone.

Custom Metric Development

For specialized environments, custom metrics often provide the most valuable insights:

Application-specific health indicators
Business process completion rates
Environmental factors (temperature, humidity for edge deployments)
Security-related indicators (authentication attempts, privilege escalations)
Compliance-related measurements

Developing these metrics typically involves custom scripts that expose data via standard protocols (SNMP, HTTP) or direct integration with monitoring platforms.

Case Study: Enterprise Linux Server Monitoring Implementation

The following case study illustrates a comprehensive monitoring implementation for a mid-sized financial services company managing 200+ Linux servers across multiple locations.

Initial Environment and Challenges

Prior to implementation, the organization faced several challenges:

Inconsistent monitoring across different server generations
Reactive troubleshooting with long mean-time-to-resolution
Limited visibility into application dependencies
Siloed monitoring between infrastructure and application teams
Frequent after-hours escalations for issues that could have been prevented

Server availability averaged 99.8% (approximately 17.5 hours of downtime annually), significantly impacting business operations.

Solution Selection Process

The company established key requirements:

Centralized monitoring with distributed data collection
Role-based access control for different teams
Integration with existing ticketing system
Automated remediation capabilities
Comprehensive reporting for compliance requirements

After evaluating several options, they implemented a hybrid solution:

Zabbix for infrastructure monitoring
Application-specific APM tools for critical systems
Custom scripts for specialized business metrics
Centralized log aggregation with ELK stack

Implementation Approach

The implementation followed a phased approach:

Core infrastructure monitoring for critical systems
Standard templates for common server roles
Application-specific monitoring for business services
Integration between monitoring systems
Alert workflow and escalation procedures
Reporting and dashboard development

Each phase included template development, testing, deployment, and staff training before proceeding to the next stage.

Results and Benefits

One year after implementation, the organization reported:

Server availability improved to 99.97% (less than 3 hours downtime annually)
Mean time to detection decreased by 72%
After-hours escalations reduced by 83%
Predictive analytics prevented an estimated 35 potential outages
Staff productivity improved through centralized visibility
Compliance reporting time reduced from days to hours

The monitoring system paid for itself within six months through reduced downtime and operational efficiencies.

Lessons Learned

Key insights from the implementation included:

Standard monitoring templates significantly accelerated deployment
Cross-team visibility reduced finger-pointing during incidents
Automation of routine checks freed staff for higher-value activities
Regular review of alerting thresholds prevented alert fatigue
Monitoring as code enabled version control for monitoring configurations

This case illustrates how comprehensive monitoring transforms operational effectiveness beyond simple uptime improvements.

Future Trends in Linux Server Monitoring

The server monitoring landscape continues to evolve rapidly. Understanding emerging trends helps organizations prepare for future monitoring requirements.

AI and Machine Learning Integration

Artificial intelligence increasingly augments monitoring systems:

Automated baseline establishment that adapts to changing workloads
Natural language processing for simplified alert management
Autonomous remediation of routine issues
Root cause analysis across complex systems
Predictive failure models based on subtle pattern recognition

These capabilities reduce human intervention requirements while improving monitoring accuracy.

Integration with DevOps Practices

Monitoring increasingly shifts “left” in the deployment lifecycle:

Monitoring as code defined alongside infrastructure
Continuous testing of monitoring during development
Automatic monitoring deployment with application changes
Integrated observability (monitoring, logging, tracing)
Service level objective (SLO) validation during deployment

This integration ensures consistent monitoring across development and production environments.

Cloud-Native and Serverless Monitoring

Traditional monitoring approaches require adaptation for modern architectures:

Function-level monitoring for serverless workloads
Cost optimization metrics alongside performance
Cross-cloud monitoring for multi-cloud deployments
Service mesh telemetry integration
Ephemeral resource tracking

Tools increasingly support these dynamic environments with agent-less and API-driven approaches.

Open Standards Development

The monitoring ecosystem increasingly embraces standardization:

OpenTelemetry for unified instrumentation
Common event format (CEF) for security events
Prometheus exposition format for metrics
Open metrics specification
Vendor-neutral alert formats

These standards improve interoperability between tools and reduce vendor lock-in concerns.

Organizations should regularly evaluate their monitoring strategies against these trends to ensure their approaches remain effective as technology evolves.

VPS Manage Service Offer

If you don’t have time to do all of this stuff, or if this is not your area of expertise, we offer a service to do “VPS Manage Service Offer”, starting from $10 (Paypal payment). Please contact us to get the best deal!